<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Irony of Differentiation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.creative-brand.com/bank-branding/the-irony-of-differentiation/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.creative-brand.com/bank-branding/the-irony-of-differentiation</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 15:18:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Story &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Terrible Taste = Great Branding</title>
		<link>http://www.creative-brand.com/bank-branding/the-irony-of-differentiation/comment-page-1#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>The Story &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Terrible Taste = Great Branding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 07:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://creative-brand.com/2007/07/30/the-irony-of-differentiation/#comment-34</guid>
		<description>[...] Bank and credit union marketing and branding people always talk about differentiation, but don&#8217;t actually want &#8220;differentiation,&#8221; they want &#8220;betterentiation.&#8221; (Refer back to the previous posts, The Irony of Differentiation Part 1 and Part 2.) Nicer service, friendlier people, better products etc. Who cares? You can&#8217;t build a strong bank brand like that, because that&#8217;s what every bank strives for. My advice: go ahead and actually BE nicer and friendlier, but when it comes to positioning, find something more unique, more ownable, and&#8230;.differentiated! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bank and credit union marketing and branding people always talk about differentiation, but don&#8217;t actually want &#8220;differentiation,&#8221; they want &#8220;betterentiation.&#8221; (Refer back to the previous posts, The Irony of Differentiation Part 1 and Part 2.) Nicer service, friendlier people, better products etc. Who cares? You can&#8217;t build a strong bank brand like that, because that&#8217;s what every bank strives for. My advice: go ahead and actually BE nicer and friendlier, but when it comes to positioning, find something more unique, more ownable, and&#8230;.differentiated! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Story &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Irony of Differentiation Part 2: What to do About It</title>
		<link>http://www.creative-brand.com/bank-branding/the-irony-of-differentiation/comment-page-1#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>The Story &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Irony of Differentiation Part 2: What to do About It</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 04:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://creative-brand.com/2007/07/30/the-irony-of-differentiation/#comment-33</guid>
		<description>[...] As you probably remember (it really was memorable, wasn&#8217;t it?!) from my post a few weeks ago, The Irony of Differentiation, we discussed how ironic the idea of differentiation really is. Last time I checked, the definition of differentiation is to make something different. Wikipedia defines differentiation as: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As you probably remember (it really was memorable, wasn&#8217;t it?!) from my post a few weeks ago, The Irony of Differentiation, we discussed how ironic the idea of differentiation really is. Last time I checked, the definition of differentiation is to make something different. Wikipedia defines differentiation as: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

